Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dan Martin vs Andrew Fenty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martin vs Fenty analysis and find out who is favored!
Dan Martin vs Andrew Fenty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin 0 - 0 Fenty
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martin has won 49.36% of points on their second serve, while Fenty has won 43.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martin, in recent form, has won 47.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fenty has won 50.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.72% and 36.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martin has saved 54.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fenty has saved 55.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martin has won 36.59% of matches played (W/L 15/ 26), with Fenty winning 57.41% (W/L 31/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 13/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Fenty has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 36/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Martin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.94% of matches (W/L 13/ 18), where as Fenty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martin has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.8 while Fenty has played against players with an average rank of 56.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fenty has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martin has converted 38.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fenty has converted 36.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
825
Rank
781
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
52% (57-53)
Career Total W/L
55% (52-43)
42% (11-15)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Dan Martin vs Andrew Fenty For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Martin VS Fenty
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dan Martin | Andrew Fenty |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (11/15) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (24/30) | 58% (37/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (250/254) | 56% (295/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 60% (18/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 45 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:43 | 1:5:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 135.46 | 22.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (894/1445) | 63% (697/1114) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (599/894) | 62% (435/697) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (272/551) | 43% (180/417) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (51/134) | 36% (51/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (524/1405) | 42% (482/1152) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (10/13) | 67% (18/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (10/25) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 94% (18/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 6% (18/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (14/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Dan Martin
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Dan Martin
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Dan Martin
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
William Grant
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
39%
(
14 of
36)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Reece Falck
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adhithya Ganesan
Player
Dan Martin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Joseph Phillips
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Dan Martin
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Fenty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Corey Craig
Player
Andrew Fenty
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Taym Alazmeh
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Enmanuel Munoz
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Andrew Fenty
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Unknown Player
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Andrew Fenty
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Andrew Fenty
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Andrew Fenty
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Vs Fenty Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Martin are available here and Fenty photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
